In re Estate of Daphne May Burns

No. 87795-0-I (Wash. Ct. App. May 11, 2026) · Washington Court of Appeals, Division One · June 23, 2026 · No. 87795-0-I

Summary

The Washington Court of Appeals, Division One, affirmed the superior court’s reversal of a commissioner’s order voiding the sale of an estate’s statutory right to redeem a foreclosed condominium. The court held that the estate administrator did not breach her fiduciary duty by selling the redemption rights for $15,000 without soliciting competing bids, and that equitable relief was unwarranted. The court also denied attorney fees because the appeal was not frivolous.

Holdings

  1. The administrator did not breach her fiduciary duty. A personal representative with nonintervention powers may sell estate property, but must exercise discretionary powers in good faith, with honest judgment, and in accordance with the interests of the beneficiaries; the evidence substantially supported the finding that Hansen committed no fraud, misconduct, or other breach.
  2. Equitable relief was not warranted. Absent a breach of fiduciary duty or other abuse of power, a court's authority to overturn a sale by a personal representative with nonintervention powers is limited, and irregularity alone is insufficient.
  3. The appeal was not frivolous, and Hansen's request for attorney fees as sanctions was denied.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the administrator breached her fiduciary duty by selling the estate's statutory redemption rights to Vitruvian for $15,000 without soliciting competing bids.
  2. Whether the circumstances surrounding the sale justified equitable relief overturning the sale of the redemption rights.
  3. Whether Porter's appeal was frivolous and warranted an award of attorney fees.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (23)

  • In re Estate of Bernard, 182 Wn. App. 692, 727-28, 332 P.3d 480 (2014)(followed)
  • In re Estate of Black, 116 Wn. App. 476, 483, 66 P.3d 670 (2003)(followed)
  • In re Estate of Reugh, 10 Wn. App. 2d 20, 63, 447 P.3d 544 (2019)(followed)
  • In re Estate of Larson, 103 Wn.2d 517, 521, 694 P.2d 1051 (1985)(distinguished)
  • Micro Enhancement Int'l, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand, LLP, 110 Wn. App. 412, 433-34, 40 P.3d 1206 (2002)(followed)
  • Lodis v. Corbis Holdings, Inc., 172 Wn. App. 835, 857, 292 P.3d 779 (2013)(followed)
  • Casterline v. Roberts, 168 Wn. App. 376, 381-82, 284 P.3d 743 (2012)(followed)
  • Blackburn v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs., 186 Wn.2d 250, 256, 375 P.3d 1076 (2016)(followed)
  • Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co., 162 Wn.2d 340, 352, 172 P.3d 688 (2007)(followed)
  • Sunnyside Valley Irrig. Dist. v. Dickie, 149 Wn.2d 873, 879-80, 73 P.3d 369 (2003)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 23.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…