State v. Duncalf

State v. Duncalf · Supreme Court of the State of Washington · May 2, 2013 · No. No. 86853-1

Summary

The Washington Supreme Court upheld an exceptional sentence imposed after a jury found that the victim's injuries substantially exceeded the bodily harm necessary to establish second degree assault. The court held that RCW 9.94A.535(3)(y) required no additional finding of great bodily harm and rejected the defendant's vagueness challenge as applied.

Holdings

  1. The substantially-exceed aggravating factor may be applied to a second degree assault conviction when the jury finds beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim's injuries substantially exceeded the level of bodily harm necessary to satisfy the offense; no finding that the defendant inflicted great bodily harm was additionally required.
  2. Assuming that a vagueness challenge may be brought against an aggravating factor, RCW 9.94A.535(3)(y) is not unconstitutionally vague as applied to Duncalf.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the aggravating factor permitting an exceptional sentence when the victim's injuries substantially exceed the level of bodily harm necessary to satisfy the offense may be applied to a conviction for second degree assault.
  2. Whether RCW 9.94A.535(3)(y), as applied to Duncalf, is unconstitutionally vague.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (13)

  • State v. Gordon, 172 Wn.2d 671, 260 P.3d 884 (2011)(followed)
  • State v. Stubbs, 170 Wn.2d 117, 240 P.3d 143 (2010)(distinguished)
  • State v. Pappas, 176 Wn.2d 188, 289 P.3d 634 (2012)(followed)
  • Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004)(followed)
  • Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000)(followed)
  • State v. Baldwin, 150 Wn.2d 448, 78 P.3d 1005 (2003)(questioned)
  • State v. Eckblad, 152 Wn.2d 515, 518, 98 P.3d 1184 (2004)(followed)
  • City of Spokane v. Douglass, 115 Wn.2d 171, 178, 795 P.2d 693 (1990)(followed)
  • State v. Branch, 129 Wn.2d 635, 648, 919 P.2d 1228 (1996)(followed)
  • Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 561 U.S. 1, 130 S. Ct. 2705, 177 L. Ed. 2d 355 (2010)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…