Summary
The Washington Supreme Court held that a trial court with personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over a dissolution proceeding may divide the parties’ personal or beneficial interests in real property located outside the state. The court distinguished adjudicating personal interests from directly determining legal title, which remains subject to the law and courts of the property’s situs. It affirmed the denial of the motion to vacate the dissolution decree’s distribution of apartment and farmland interests in Poland.
Holdings
- When a trial court has personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the dissolution proceeding, it has authority to divide the parties' personal or beneficial interests in property brought before it, wherever the property is located. Such a division is a valid in personam decree.
- The decree was not void because it did not operate as a muniment of title or directly transfer legal title to the Polish properties; it validly determined the spouses' beneficial interests.
Questions Presented
- Whether a Washington trial court with personal jurisdiction over the spouses and subject matter jurisdiction over a marital dissolution may divide the spouses' personal or beneficial interests in real property located in Poland.
- Whether the dissolution decree was void and subject to vacation under CR 60(b)(5) because it purported to affect title to foreign real property.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (20)
- Brown v. Brown, 46 Wash. 2d 370, 281 P.2d 850 (1955)(distinguished)
- Massie v. Watts, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 148, 3 L. Ed. 181 (1810)(followed)
- Silver Surprize, Inc. v. Sunshine Mining Co., 74 Wash. 2d 519, 526, 445 P.2d 334 (1968)(followed)
- Donaldson v. Greenwood, 40 Wash. 2d 238, 251, 242 P.2d 1038 (1952)(followed)
- United Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Price, 46 Wash. 2d 587, 283 P.2d 119 (1955)(followed)
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Wadsworth, 102 Wash. 2d 652, 689 P.2d 46 (1984)(limited)
- In re Marriage of Little, 96 Wash. 2d 183, 194, 634 P.2d 498 (1981)(followed)
- Arneson v. Arneson, 38 Wash. 2d 99, 102, 227 P.2d 1016 (1951)(followed)
- Fall v. Eastin, 215 U.S. 1, 30 S. Ct. 3, 54 L. Ed. 65 (1909)(followed)
- Phelps v. Williams, 192 A.2d 805 (D.C. 1963)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…