Summary
The Washington Supreme Court held that a probation officer must have probable cause to believe a probationer resides at a particular location before conducting a warrantless search of that residence under article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution. The court rejected the inevitable discovery doctrine under the state constitution, reversed the Court of Appeals, and remanded for a new suppression hearing. A concurrence agreed with the remand but concluded that the existing facts established probable cause.
Holdings
- Before conducting a warrantless search of a residence, a probation officer must have probable cause to believe that the probationer resides at that particular residence; the Terry reasonable-suspicion standard is insufficient.
- The inevitable discovery doctrine is incompatible with article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution and cannot be used to admit evidence obtained through a constitutional violation.
Questions Presented
- What level of suspicion must a probation or community corrections officer possess to determine that a particular residence is the probationer's residence before conducting a warrantless search of that residence under article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution?
- Whether evidence obtained through an otherwise unlawful warrantless search may be admitted under the inevitable discovery doctrine under article I, section 7.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (28)
- State v. Winterstein, 140 Wn. App. 676, 166 P.3d 1242 (2007)(reversed)
- State v. Winterstein, 163 Wn. 2d 1033, 187 P.3d 269 (2008)(followed procedurally)
- State v. Duncan, 146 Wn. 2d 166, 171, 43 P.3d 513 (2002)(followed)
- State v. Hill, 123 Wn. 2d 641, 647, 870 P.2d 313 (1994)(followed)
- State v. Morse, 156 Wn. 2d 1, 7, 10, 123 P.3d 832 (2005)(followed)
- State v. Ladson, 138 Wn. 2d 343, 348, 350, 359-60, 979 P.2d 833 (1999)(followed)
- State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn. 2d 61, 70, 917 P.2d 563 (1996)(followed)
- State v. Houser, 95 Wn. 2d 143, 149, 622 P.2d 1218 (1980)(followed)
- Motley v. Parks, 432 F.3d 1072, 1080 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- State v. Hatchie, 161 Wn. 2d 390, 392-93, 402-03, 166 P.3d 698 (2007)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 28.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…