Sinkewitz v. City of Huntington

217 W. Va. 265 (2005) · Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia · May 13, 2005

Summary

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia held that res judicata barred Charlotte Mae Sinkewitz’s second challenge to the City of Huntington’s zoning ordinance governing continued operation of a bar in a residential area. The court reversed the Circuit Court of Wayne County’s order directing the city to issue her a license, concluding that the constitutional challenge could have been litigated in the earlier action.

Holdings

  1. Res judicata barred the second action because the prior case was a final adjudication on the merits by a court with jurisdiction, involved the same parties, and concerned the same cause of action—the constitutionality of the City's zoning ordinance.
  2. Review of the circuit court's final order and ultimate disposition is for abuse of discretion, factual findings are reviewed for clear error, and legal questions are reviewed de novo.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the 1997 Wayne County judgment upholding the City's zoning ordinance barred Sinkewitz's subsequent action under res judicata.
  2. Whether different constitutional theories, including due process rather than vagueness and equal protection, and additional abandonment evidence prevented application of res judicata.

Disposition

reversed

Cases Cited (5)

  • Walker v. West Virginia Ethics Commission, 201 W. Va. 108, 492 S.E.2d 167 (1997)(followed)
  • Blake v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc., 201 W. Va. 469, 498 S.E.2d 41 (1997)(followed)
  • Slider v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 210 W. Va. 476, 557 S.E.2d 883 (2001)(followed)
  • Sayre's Administrator v. Harpold, 33 W. Va. 553, 11 S.E. 16 (1890)(followed)
  • Cabell & Wayne County Tavern and Restaurant Association, Inc. v. Zoning Appeals Board of the City of Huntington, Civil Action No. 99-C-00063(considered)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…