Summary
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed the denial of Brandon Rice’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Rice argued ineffective assistance of counsel, lack of a factual basis for his voluntary manslaughter plea, involuntariness, and failure to receive the case record. The court held that the record established a factual basis for the Kennedy plea and that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion.
Holdings
- The circuit court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rice's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
- The appendix record established a factual basis for Rice's guilty plea and conviction, including evidence that the victim's death resulted from the injuries sustained in the altercation.
- Rice failed to establish a defect in counsel's performance sufficient to warrant habeas relief.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court erred in denying habeas relief on Rice's ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim.
- Whether the record established a factual basis for Rice's guilty plea and conviction for voluntary manslaughter.
- Whether Rice's claim that pre-existing injuries and alcoholism caused the victim's death entitled him to habeas relief or deprived the circuit court of jurisdiction.
- Whether Rice was entitled to relief based on his assertion that he had not received a copy of the case record.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Kennedy v. Frazier, 178 W.Va. 10, 357 S.E.2d 43 (1987)(applied)
- State v. Miller, 194 W.Va. 3, 459 S.E.2d 114 (1995)(applied)
- Mathena v. Haines, 219 W.Va. 417, 633 S.E.2d 771 (2006)(applied)
- State v. Durham, 156 W.Va. 509, 195 S.E.2d 144 (1973)(applied)
- Perdue v. Coiner, 156 W.Va. 467, 194 S.E.2d 657 (1973)(applied)
- Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)(not reached)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…