Summary
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed the termination of Petitioner Father’s parental rights to V.W. The court held that the circuit court had sufficient evidence to find no reasonable likelihood that the conditions of abuse and neglect could be substantially corrected in the near future and that termination was necessary for the child’s welfare, despite denying an improvement period.
Holdings
- The circuit court did not err or abuse its discretion by denying an improvement period and terminating Petitioner Father's parental rights.
- The evidence was sufficient to support findings that there was no reasonable likelihood that the conditions of abuse and neglect could be substantially corrected in the near future and that termination was necessary for the child's welfare.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court erred by terminating Petitioner Father's parental rights without granting an improvement period.
- Whether the evidence supported findings that there was no reasonable likelihood that the conditions of abuse and neglect could be substantially corrected in the near future and that termination was necessary for the child's welfare.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- In Interest of Tiffany Marie S., 196 W. Va. 223, 470 S.E.2d 177 (1996)(followed)
- In re Cecil T., 228 W. Va. 89, 717 S.E.2d 873 (2011)(followed)
- In re Maranda T., 223 W. Va. 512, 678 S.E.2d 18 (2009)(considered)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…