Summary
The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of a permanent injunction sought by JPMorgan Chase Bank concerning vehicular access across a shopping plaza parking lot. The court held that Chase Bank failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence the elements of an easement implied by prior use, including necessity at the time of severance and the existence of a sufficiently long-standing and obvious use.
Holdings
- Chase Bank failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence the elements of an easement implied by prior use, particularly that use of ByPass's lot was necessary at the time of severance and that the asserted use then existed and was sufficiently longstanding and obvious to demonstrate an intent that it be permanent.
- The circuit court did not clearly err in its factual findings or abuse its discretion in denying Chase Bank a permanent injunction.
Questions Presented
- Whether Chase Bank established an easement implied by prior use over ByPass's property.
- Whether the circuit court clearly erred in finding that Chase Bank failed to prove the necessity and pre-severance-use elements of an easement implied by prior use.
- Whether the circuit court abused its discretion by denying a permanent injunction.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty, 141 W.Va. 627, 92 S.E.2d 891 (1956)(followed)
- Foster v. Orchard Dev. Co., LLC, 227 W.Va. 119, 705 S.E.2d 816 (2010)(followed)
- Public Citizen, Inc. v. First Nat. Bank in Fairmont, 198 W.Va. 329, 480 S.E.2d 538 (1996)(followed)
- Quicken Loans, Inc. v. Brown, 230 W.Va. 306, 737 S.E.2d 640 (2012)(followed)
- Cobb v. Daugherty, 225 W.Va. 435, 693 S.E.2d 800 (2010)(followed)
- Berkeley Development Corp. v. Hutzler, 159 W.Va. 844, 229 S.E.2d 732 (1976)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…