Summary
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed the denial of attorney’s fees and costs following the reversal of a claims administrator’s denial of Gabapentin and Metaxalone in a workers’ compensation claim. The Court held that the denial was not unreasonable under West Virginia Code § 23-2C-21(c) because the medications had also been requested in a separate claim involving a different injury. The Court found no clear legal or factual error in the Board of Review’s decision.
Holdings
- A claimant's successful reversal of a denial of medical benefits does not automatically entitle the claimant to attorney’s fees and costs; the denial must have been unreasonable under West Virginia Code § 23-2C-21(c).
- The Board of Review did not clearly violate a constitutional or statutory provision, clearly err in its legal conclusions, or materially misstate or mischaracterize the evidentiary record; therefore, its decision was affirmed.
Questions Presented
- Whether Delbert was entitled to attorney’s fees and costs under West Virginia Code § 23-2C-21(c) after successfully obtaining reversal of the denial of workers’ compensation medications.
- Whether the claims administrator’s denial of Gabapentin and Metaxalone was unreasonable when made.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (0)
No outbound citations extracted.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…