State of West Virginia v. David M. Corey

233 W. Va. 297 (2014) · Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia · April 23, 2014 · No. No. 13-0769

Summary

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed David M. Corey’s conviction for first-degree murder and sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole. The court rejected challenges to the search-warrant affidavit, admission of ammunition and knives, speedy-trial ruling, denial of a mistrial, and sufficiency of the evidence. The opinion applies probable-cause, evidentiary, continuance, waiver, mistrial, and sufficiency-of-the-evidence standards.

Holdings

  1. The search-warrant affidavits established probable cause under the totality of the circumstances because they described the shooting, supplied information from a known individual who had known Corey for more than a year, described his hostility toward the victim and his access to weapons and ammunition, and established a nexus between the suspected criminal activity and the places to be searched.
  2. The trial court properly admitted evidence concerning the collector knives because the evidence supported an inference that Corey owned the ammunition found nearby, and its probative value was not substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice or confusion. Any separate challenge to the ammunition was waived because Corey did not brief it.
  3. The circuit court did not abuse its discretion by continuing the trial beyond the term in which Corey was indicted because the prosecutor's recovery from surgery constituted good cause and the record showed no substantial prejudice to Corey.
  4. The mistrial issue was not properly before the court because Corey did not make a timely pre-verdict motion for mistrial and did not adequately brief the issue. In any event, the trial court's curative instruction rendered the isolated statement harmless.
  5. The evidence was sufficient to support Corey's first-degree murder conviction because, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational jury could find the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the affidavits supporting search warrants for Corey's home and vehicle established probable cause despite relying in part on hearsay.
  2. Whether evidence concerning ammunition and collector knives found at or associated with Corey's residence was improperly admitted as irrelevant or unfairly prejudicial.
  3. Whether the continuance of trial beyond the term in which Corey was indicted violated West Virginia Code section 62-3-1.
  4. Whether the trial court erred by failing to declare a mistrial after a witness referred to Corey as a felon.
  5. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support Corey's first-degree murder conviction.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (26)

  • State v. Thomas, 187 W. Va. 686, 421 S.E.2d 227 (1992)(followed)
  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983)(followed)
  • State v. Adkins, 176 W. Va. 613, 346 S.E.2d 762 (1986)(followed)
  • State v. Lilly, 194 W. Va. 595, 461 S.E.2d 101 (1995)(followed)
  • State v. Kilmer, 190 W. Va. 617, 439 S.E.2d 881 (1993)(followed)
  • State v. Worley, 179 W. Va. 403, 369 S.E.2d 706 (1988)(distinguished)
  • State v. Bruffey, 231 W. Va. 502, 745 S.E.2d 540 (2013)(followed)
  • State v. Corbett, 177 W. Va. 397, 352 S.E.2d 149 (1986)(followed)
  • State v. Rodoussakis, 204 W. Va. 58, 511 S.E.2d 469 (1998)(followed)
  • State v. Peyatt, 173 W. Va. 317, 315 S.E.2d 574 (1983)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 26.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…