Summary
Justice Loughry concurred in the decision upholding the revocation of Dustin Hall’s driver’s license and disqualification from operating commercial vehicles based on his refusal to submit to a designated secondary chemical breath test. The concurrence stated that the implied-consent violation independently resolved the case, making it unnecessary to address the separate DUI-based revocation ground or the blood-test issue.
Holdings
- A driver's refusal to submit to the designated secondary chemical breath test in violation of West Virginia Code § 17C-5-7 independently supports revocation of the driver's license and disqualification from operating commercial vehicles.
- When the implied-consent violation independently determines the revocation and disqualification, it is unnecessary to decide the separate DUI and blood-test grounds.
Questions Presented
- Whether refusal to submit to the designated secondary chemical breath test independently supports revocation of Hall's driver's license and disqualification from operating commercial vehicles.
- Whether the court needed to address the separate DUI and blood-test grounds for revocation when the implied-consent violation was independently dispositive.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Poulos v. State of New Hampshire, 345 U.S. 395, 414 (1953) (Frankfurter, J., concurring)(quoted)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…