In re: The Estate of Mary E. McClain

No. 15-0434 · Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia · April 15, 2016 · No. No. 15-0434

Summary

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed an order directing the final distribution of real estate sale proceeds from the Estate of Mary E. McClain. The court held that the circuit court was constrained by the limited remand in Holland v. Joyce and properly declined to consider additional assets not involved in the earlier litigation. The court also summarily rejected the petitioner's remaining assignments of error.

Holdings

  1. A circuit court receiving a limited remand must follow the appellate mandate and may address only the issues identified within that mandate. The circuit court correctly limited the proceedings to implementing Holland v. Joyce and determining the possible credit against the judgment.
  2. The circuit court did not err by refusing to find that additional assets belonged to McClain's estate for distribution in the existing case.
  3. Adams was not denied an opportunity to be heard because the transcript of the August 12, 2013, hearing contradicted that assertion.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the circuit court complied with the Supreme Court of Appeals' limited remand in Holland v. Joyce.
  2. Whether the circuit court erred by refusing to find that assets beyond the funeral home, cemetery, and associated real estate belonged to McClain's estate for purposes of distribution.
  3. Whether Adams was denied an opportunity to be heard.
  4. Whether Adams showed good cause for a requested reinstatement or for presenting a new claim in the longstanding estate litigation.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (3)

  • Holland v. Joyce, 155 W. Va. 535, 185 S.E.2d 505 (1971)(followed)
  • Burgess v. Porterfield, 196 W. Va. 178, 469 S.E.2d 114 (1996)(followed)
  • State ex rel. Frazier & Oxley, L.C. v. Cummings, 214 W. Va. 802, 591 S.E.2d 728 (2003)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…