Summary
The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed the Mercer County Circuit Court’s denial of Larry B.’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court rejected claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and an involuntary guilty plea, adopting the circuit court’s findings and conclusions.
Holdings
- An appellate court reviews the final order and ultimate disposition for abuse of discretion, underlying factual findings for clear error, and questions of law de novo.
- The petitioner was not entitled to habeas relief based on his ineffective-assistance claim because the record and circuit court's order disclosed no clear error or abuse of discretion.
- The petitioner was not entitled to habeas relief based on his claim that his guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court erred in denying habeas relief based on alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
- Whether the circuit court erred in denying habeas relief based on the claim that the guilty plea was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (6)
- In re K.H., 235 W. Va. 254, 773 S.E.2d 20 (2015)(followed)
- Melinda H. v. William R. II, 230 W. Va. 731, 742 S.E.2d 419 (2013)(followed)
- State v. Brandon B., 218 W. Va. 324, 624 S.E.2d 761 (2005)(followed)
- State v. Edward Charles L., 183 W. Va. 641, 398 S.E.2d 123 (1990)(followed)
- Mathena v. Haines, 219 W. Va. 417, 633 S.E.2d 771 (2006)(followed)
- State ex rel. Franklin v. McBride, 226 W. Va. 375, 701 S.E.2d 97 (2010)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…