Summary
The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed a circuit court order concerning the distribution of escrowed funds after enforcement of a lease-based option to purchase commercial real estate. The court declined to consider several assignments of error as untimely and also declined to address the remaining rent-related assignment because the petitioner’s brief failed to comply with appellate briefing requirements. The decision was issued as a memorandum decision under Rule 21 of the West Virginia Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Holdings
- Assignments of error directed at circuit court orders entered more than four months before the appeal were untimely and would not be considered.
- The Court would not address CCC's assignment of error because the brief did not comply with Rule 10(c)(7)'s requirements for legal authority and specific record citations.
Questions Presented
- Whether CCC's assignments of error concerning orders entered before the June 26, 2017, interpleader order were timely appealed.
- Whether the circuit court erred by denying CCC's claim to rent for January through April 2017 on the ground that the denial constituted additional sanctions.
- Whether the Court should consider an assignment of error that was inadequately supported by legal authority and specific citations to the appellate record.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Public Citizen, Inc. v. First National Bank in Fairmont, 198 W. Va. 329, 480 S.E.2d 538 (1996)(followed)
- Valentine & Kebartas, Inc. v. Lenahan, 239 W. Va. 416, 801 S.E.2d 431 (2017)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…