Summary
The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of petitioner father’s parental rights in a child abuse and neglect proceeding. The court held that he had received meaningful services and failed to remedy the conditions of abuse and neglect, and it rejected his argument that he was entitled to additional services or a further improvement period. The court also reminded the circuit court of its duties concerning the children’s permanent placement.
Holdings
- The circuit court did not err by refusing to grant petitioner an additional service or improvement period because petitioner had already received numerous services and failed to make sufficient progress during the improvement period.
- Termination of petitioner's parental rights was supported by sufficient evidence because there was no reasonable likelihood that the conditions of abuse and neglect could be substantially corrected in the near future and termination was in the children's best interests.
- The Supreme Court reviews legal conclusions de novo and factual findings for clear error, affirming findings that are plausible in light of the entire record.
- The circuit court must continue periodic permanent-placement reviews and comply with the requirement to establish a permanent placement for C.C.-1 within twelve months of the dispositional order absent extraordinary, fully substantiated circumstances.
Questions Presented
- Whether the circuit court erred by failing to provide petitioner with a meaningful improvement period or additional services, including marriage counseling before family counseling.
- Whether the evidence supported termination of petitioner's parental rights based on the absence of a reasonable likelihood that the conditions of abuse and neglect could be substantially corrected in the near future and the children's best interests.
- Whether the circuit court had continuing duties to review and achieve permanent placement for C.C.-1 after termination.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (11)
- In re K.H., 235 W. Va. 254, 773 S.E.2d 20 (2015)(followed)
- Melinda H. v. William R. II, 230 W. Va. 731, 742 S.E.2d 419 (2013)(followed)
- State v. Brandon B., 218 W. Va. 324, 624 S.E.2d 761 (2005)(followed)
- State v. Edward Charles L., 183 W. Va. 641, 398 S.E.2d 123 (1990)(followed)
- In Interest of Tiffany Marie S., 196 W. Va. 223, 470 S.E.2d 177 (1996)(followed)
- In re Cecil T., 228 W. Va. 89, 717 S.E.2d 873 (2011)(followed)
- In Interest of Carlita B., 185 W. Va. 613, 408 S.E.2d 365 (1991)(followed)
- In re R.J.M., 164 W. Va. 496, 266 S.E.2d 114 (1980)(followed)
- In re Kristin Y., 227 W. Va. 558, 712 S.E.2d 55 (2011)(followed)
- State v. Michael M., 202 W. Va. 350, 504 S.E.2d 177 (1998)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…