Smith v. Chestnut Ridge Storage, LLC

Smith · Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia · February 24, 2021 · No. No. 19-1076

Summary

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia held that it could immediately review the denial of the petitioners’ summary-judgment motion under the collateral-order doctrine because the motion asserted immunity defenses. The court concluded that the litigation privilege and the Noerr-Pennington doctrine barred Chestnut Ridge Storage, LLC’s counterclaims arising from the petitioners’ participation and statements in a FERC proceeding. The court reversed the circuit court’s order and remanded with directions to enter summary judgment for the petitioners.

Holdings

  1. The denial of Petitioners' summary-judgment motion was immediately reviewable under the collateral order doctrine because the immunity issues conclusively determined an important issue separate from the merits and would be effectively unreviewable after trial.
  2. Petitioners were immune from Chestnut Ridge's counterclaim under the litigation privilege because the counterclaim was based solely on statements made during a quasi-judicial FERC proceeding.
  3. Petitioners' participation and statements in the FERC proceeding were protected by the Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which barred all of Chestnut Ridge's claims based on that petitioning activity.
  4. Petitioners were entitled to summary judgment on the entirety of Chestnut Ridge's counterclaim, including its declaratory-judgment claims.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the circuit court's denial of Petitioners' summary-judgment motion based on immunity was immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine.
  2. Whether Petitioners' participation and statements in the FERC proceeding were protected by West Virginia's litigation privilege.
  3. Whether Petitioners' participation and statements in the FERC proceeding were protected by the Noerr-Pennington doctrine.
  4. Whether the litigation privilege and Noerr-Pennington doctrine applied to Chestnut Ridge's breach-of-contract, slander-of-title, civil-conspiracy, and declaratory-judgment claims.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (21)

  • Findley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 213 W. Va. 80, 576 S.E.2d 807 (2002)(followed)
  • Painter v. Peavy, 192 W. Va. 189, 451 S.E.2d 755 (1994)(followed)
  • Williams v. Precision Coil, Inc., 194 W. Va. 52, 459 S.E.2d 329 (1995)(followed)
  • Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New York, 148 W. Va. 160, 133 S.E.2d 770 (1963)(followed)
  • Robinson v. Pack, 223 W. Va. 828, 679 S.E.2d 660 (2009)(followed)
  • Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Front, 231 W. Va. 518, 745 S.E.2d 556 (2013)(followed)
  • Clark v. Druckman, 218 W. Va. 427, 624 S.E.2d 864 (2005)(followed)
  • Collins v. Red Roof Inns, Inc., 211 W. Va. 458, 566 S.E.2d 595 (2002)(followed)
  • Barefield v. DPIC Cos., Inc., 215 W. Va. 544, 600 S.E.2d 256 (2004)(followed)
  • Farber v. Dale, 182 W. Va. 784, 392 S.E.2d 224 (1990)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…