Summary
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed Elliott D. Lansdowne’s convictions and consecutive sentences for first-degree murder and use or presentation of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The court rejected claims concerning the length of jury deliberations during the COVID-19 pandemic, suppression of Lansdowne’s recorded police interview, denial of a trial continuance, and sufficiency of the evidence. The court issued the opinion as a memorandum decision under Rule 21 of the West Virginia Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Holdings
- A challenge based solely on the length of jury deliberations is an intrinsic challenge to the verdict and may not impeach the verdict; the petitioner presented no proof of extrinsic misconduct or COVID-19 influence warranting a new trial.
- The recorded interview was voluntary and was not the product of coercive police activity; the circuit court properly denied the motion to suppress.
- The court declined to address the instructional-error claim because the assignment of error was inadequately briefed and lacked the required record citations and pertinent legal authority.
- The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient for a rational jury to find the essential elements of the charged crimes beyond a reasonable doubt; the denial of judgment of acquittal was proper.
Questions Presented
- Whether the short duration of the jury's deliberations, allegedly influenced by COVID-19 concerns, constituted impeachable juror misconduct warranting a new trial.
- Whether Lansdowne's recorded statements were involuntary because police interrogation tactics, alleged promises, sentencing-related statements, or misrepresentations affected the voluntariness of his confession.
- Whether the circuit court erred by refusing to give an involuntary-manslaughter instruction.
- Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions and whether the circuit court properly denied judgment of acquittal.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (14)
- State v. Vance, 207 W. Va. 640, 535 S.E.2d 484 (2000)(followed)
- State v. Trail, 236 W. Va. 167, 778 S.E.2d 616 (2015)(followed)
- State v. Scotchel, 168 W. Va. 545, 285 S.E.2d 384 (1981)(followed)
- State v. Jenner, 236 W. Va. 406, 780 S.E.2d 762 (2015)(followed)
- State v. Farley, 192 W. Va. 247, 452 S.E.2d 50 (1994)(followed)
- State v. Bradshaw, 193 W. Va. 519, 457 S.E.2d 456 (1995)(followed)
- State v. Sugg, 193 W. Va. 388, 456 S.E.2d 469 (1995)(followed)
- State v. Persinger, 169 W. Va. 121, 286 S.E.2d 261 (1982)(followed)
- State v. Worley, 179 W. Va. 403, 369 S.E.2d 706 (1988)(followed)
- Meadows v. Mutter, 243 W. Va. 211, 842 S.E.2d 764 (2020)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…