State of West Virginia v. Lansdowne

Lansdowne · Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia · January 12, 2022 · No. No. 20-1004

Summary

The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed Elliott D. Lansdowne’s convictions and consecutive sentences for first-degree murder and use or presentation of a firearm during the commission of a felony. The court rejected claims concerning the length of jury deliberations during the COVID-19 pandemic, suppression of Lansdowne’s recorded police interview, denial of a trial continuance, and sufficiency of the evidence. The court issued the opinion as a memorandum decision under Rule 21 of the West Virginia Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Holdings

  1. A challenge based solely on the length of jury deliberations is an intrinsic challenge to the verdict and may not impeach the verdict; the petitioner presented no proof of extrinsic misconduct or COVID-19 influence warranting a new trial.
  2. The recorded interview was voluntary and was not the product of coercive police activity; the circuit court properly denied the motion to suppress.
  3. The court declined to address the instructional-error claim because the assignment of error was inadequately briefed and lacked the required record citations and pertinent legal authority.
  4. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was sufficient for a rational jury to find the essential elements of the charged crimes beyond a reasonable doubt; the denial of judgment of acquittal was proper.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the short duration of the jury's deliberations, allegedly influenced by COVID-19 concerns, constituted impeachable juror misconduct warranting a new trial.
  2. Whether Lansdowne's recorded statements were involuntary because police interrogation tactics, alleged promises, sentencing-related statements, or misrepresentations affected the voluntariness of his confession.
  3. Whether the circuit court erred by refusing to give an involuntary-manslaughter instruction.
  4. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the convictions and whether the circuit court properly denied judgment of acquittal.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (14)

  • State v. Vance, 207 W. Va. 640, 535 S.E.2d 484 (2000)(followed)
  • State v. Trail, 236 W. Va. 167, 778 S.E.2d 616 (2015)(followed)
  • State v. Scotchel, 168 W. Va. 545, 285 S.E.2d 384 (1981)(followed)
  • State v. Jenner, 236 W. Va. 406, 780 S.E.2d 762 (2015)(followed)
  • State v. Farley, 192 W. Va. 247, 452 S.E.2d 50 (1994)(followed)
  • State v. Bradshaw, 193 W. Va. 519, 457 S.E.2d 456 (1995)(followed)
  • State v. Sugg, 193 W. Va. 388, 456 S.E.2d 469 (1995)(followed)
  • State v. Persinger, 169 W. Va. 121, 286 S.E.2d 261 (1982)(followed)
  • State v. Worley, 179 W. Va. 403, 369 S.E.2d 706 (1988)(followed)
  • Meadows v. Mutter, 243 W. Va. 211, 842 S.E.2d 764 (2020)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…