Summary
The Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia affirmed the revocation of Rusty Allen White’s supervised release and his two-year prison sentence. The court held that United States v. Haymond does not apply to revocation under West Virginia Code § 62-12-26 because that statute does not require a mandatory minimum sentence upon revocation. The court also held that the evidence supported the circuit court’s finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that White violated his supervised-release conditions by possessing and using cocaine and conspiring to deliver crack cocaine.
Holdings
- When reviewing an order modifying or revoking supervised release under West Virginia Code § 62-12-26(h), the court reviews the final order and decision for abuse of discretion, factual findings for clear error, and questions of law and statutory interpretations de novo.
- United States v. Haymond does not apply to a supervised-release revocation under West Virginia Code § 62-12-26 because the statute does not require a mandatory minimum sentence upon revocation.
- Apprendi and its progeny do not prohibit aggregate sentences consisting of the original sentence and a supervised-release revocation sentence from exceeding the statutory maximum for the underlying offense.
- The circuit court did not clearly err in finding by clear and convincing evidence that White conspired to deliver crack cocaine and violated a supervised-release condition.
Questions Presented
- Whether revocation of supervised release under West Virginia Code § 62-12-26 and imposition of additional imprisonment required a jury finding beyond a reasonable doubt under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments.
- Whether United States v. Haymond applies to revocation of supervised release under West Virginia Code § 62-12-26.
- Whether the circuit court clearly erred in finding by clear and convincing evidence that White conspired to deliver crack cocaine in violation of a supervised-release condition.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (31)
- United States v. Haymond, 588 U.S. ___, 139 S. Ct. 2369, 204 L. Ed. 2d 897 (2019)(distinguished)
- State v. Less, 170 W. Va. 259, 294 S.E.2d 62 (1981)(followed)
- State v. Hargus, 232 W. Va. 735, 753 S.E.2d 893 (2013)(followed)
- State v. Hedrick, 236 W. Va. 217, 778 S.E.2d 666 (2015)(followed)
- Burgess v. Porterfield, 196 W. Va. 178, 469 S.E.2d 114 (1996)(followed)
- State v. Duke, 200 W. Va. 356, 489 S.E.2d 738 (1997)(followed)
- State v. Rutherford, 223 W. Va. 1, 672 S.E.2d 137 (2008)(followed)
- State v. Johnny Ray D., No. 20-0009, 2021 WL 3833254 (W. Va. Aug. 27, 2021)(considered)
- State v. Stephens, No. 19-1103, 2021 WL 1550260 (W. Va. Apr. 20, 2021)(considered)
- State v. Raymond B., No. 20-0605, 2021 WL 2580715 (W. Va. June 23, 2021)(considered)
Showing top 10 of 31.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.