Summary
The court addresses motions concerning a preliminary injunction in a trademark dispute over the use of “Light” and “Lite” labels for low-calorie beer. It denies the motion to vacate the injunction, declines to issue a declaration regarding an alternative label, and refuses to stay the injunction pending appeal while allowing the defendant to seek a stay from the Court of Appeals.
Holdings
- A trademark registrant need not be deprived of the procedural advantages conferred by its registration merely because the accused product is not the exact functional equivalent of the product described in the registration. Because Heileman's beer was distinctly low-calorie, Miller retained those procedural advantages.
- Miller had not lost its legal advantage because of genericness absent a clear showing by hard evidence that the public widely understood "light" as applied to beer to denote low-caloric content. The record did not make that showing.
- The court declined to issue a definitive declaration concerning whether Label X was a colorable imitation because the record did not support a definitive determination one way or the other.
- The preliminary injunction would not be stayed by the district court pending appeal, although the defendant was entitled to seek such a stay from the Court of Appeals before being compelled to discontinue Label E.
Questions Presented
- Whether Miller's trademark registrations provided procedural advantages in an infringement action involving Heileman's low-calorie beer even though the registrations referred to beer with no available carbohydrates.
- Whether the term "light" had become generic as applied to beer so that Miller had lost its legal advantage.
- Whether the record supported a definitive declaration that proposed Label X was not a colorable imitation of Miller's trademark and therefore would not violate the preliminary injunction.
- Whether the preliminary injunction should be stayed pending appeal.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (0)
No outbound citations extracted.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…