WJH v. State

24 P.3d 1147 (Wyo. 2001) · Supreme Court of Wyoming · June 14, 2001 · No. C-00-9

Summary

The Wyoming Supreme Court reviewed a juvenile delinquency disposition involving indefinite probation and 360 hours of community service in lieu of restitution. The court held that the juvenile court had broad discretion to impose sanctions, but that deviation from the statutory progressive-sanctions guidelines required written reasons in the record. The adjudication order was affirmed, the dispositional order was reversed, and the matter was remanded.

Holdings

  1. The Juvenile Justice Act does not require the juvenile court to assign one of the five progressive sanction levels or limit the court to sanctions listed at a particular level. The Act gives the juvenile court broad discretion to tailor an appropriate disposition.
  2. When the juvenile court omits assignment of a sanction level or imposes sanctions different from those provided at any sanction level, it has deviated from the statutory guidelines and must state written reasons for the deviation in the record.
  3. The juvenile court complied with Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-247(c) by explaining to WJH in age-appropriate terms that further violations of law could result in a more serious disposition; the court was not required to read the statutory sanctions verbatim.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Wyoming Juvenile Justice Act required the juvenile court to impose one of the statutory progressive sanction levels.
  2. Whether the juvenile court could impose sanctions different from those specified at any statutory sanction level without written reasons for the deviation.
  3. Whether the juvenile court's advisement that future delinquent conduct could result in more serious sanctions satisfied Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-6-247(c).
  4. Whether the adjudication order's terminology and purported waiver of appellate rights required reversal.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (25)

  • McAdams v. State, 907 P.2d 1302, 1304 (Wyo. 1995)(followed)
  • GN v. State (In re C.N.), 816 P.2d 1282, 1283 (Wyo. 1991)(followed)
  • ALJ v. State, 836 P.2d 307, 311, 313 (Wyo. 1992)(followed)
  • A.M.R. v. State, 741 N.E.2d 727, 729 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000)(persuasive)
  • In the Matter of C.C., 13 S.W.3d 854, 859 (Tex. App. 2000)(persuasive)
  • People v. V.O., 287 Ill. App. 3d 1055, 223 Ill. Dec. 468, 679 N.E.2d 1241, 1243 (1997)(persuasive)
  • State v. James P., 180 Wis. 2d 677, 510 N.W.2d 730, 732 (Ct. App. 1993)(persuasive)
  • San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Sherry A. (In re Corey A.), 227 Cal. App. 3d 339, 277 Cal. Rptr. 782, 786 (1991)(persuasive)
  • Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815, 825, 108 S. Ct. 2687, 2693, 101 L. Ed. 2d 702, 712 (1988)(persuasive)
  • Interest of W.L.F., Nos. 0-760, 00-0939, 2001 WL 103522, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Feb. 7, 2001)(persuasive)

Showing top 10 of 25.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…