Wagstaff v. Sublette County Board of County Commissioners

Wagstaff v. Sublette County Bd. of County Comm'rs, 53 P.3d 79 (Wyo. 2002) · Supreme Court of Wyoming · August 20, 2002 · No. No. 01-81

Summary

The Wyoming Supreme Court reviewed a county board's establishment of a private road across the Wagstaffs' property for access to Grindstone Cattle Company's land. The court affirmed the finding that the private road was necessary and upheld the thirty-foot width, but reversed the damages assessment because the required before-and-after valuation analysis was not performed. The matter was remanded for a proper determination of damages.

Holdings

  1. A landowner demonstrates statutory necessity when the property lacks a legally enforceable outlet to a convenient public road; the owner need not overcome every possible obstacle or pursue an impractical, uneconomic, or legally uncertain alternative route. The Board's finding that GCC lacked such an outlet and that the unimproved State and BLM dirt tracks did not provide a legally sufficient public-road connection was supported by substantial evidence and was not erroneous as a matter of law.
  2. The Board has discretion under Wyoming law to modify a viewers' and appraisers' report when reviewing and establishing a private road, and the Board did not abuse that discretion or act arbitrarily or capriciously by setting the road at thirty feet over its entire length.
  3. A damages assessment for a private road must use the prescribed before-and-after valuation analysis: determine the value of the affected property before the road is established, determine the value of the remaining property afterward, and subtract the after value from the before value. Because the Board did not conduct or explain that analysis, the damages award was reversed and remanded.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Board properly found that GCC's property had no outlet to, or connection with, a convenient public road and therefore qualified for a private road under Wyoming Statutes § 24-9-101.
  2. Whether the Board acted arbitrarily, capriciously, abused its discretion, or lacked substantial evidence when it modified the viewers' report and established a thirty-foot-wide private road over the entire route.
  3. Whether the Board's $10,000 damages award complied with the required before-and-after valuation analysis and was supported by the record.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (18)

  • Dunning v. Ankney, 936 P.2d 61, 63 (Wyo. 1997)(followed)
  • State ex rel. Workers' Compensation Div. v. Fisher, 914 P.2d 1224, 1226 (Wyo. 1996)(followed)
  • Celotex Corp. v. Andren, 917 P.2d 178, 180 (Wyo. 1996)(followed)
  • Latimer v. Rissler & McMurry Co., 902 P.2d 706, 709 (Wyo. 1995)(followed)
  • Mayland v. Flitner, 2001 WY 69, ¶¶ 10, 26, 35-39, 28 P.3d 838(followed)
  • Miller v. Bradley, 4 P.3d 882, 886-89 (Wyo. 2000)(followed)
  • Gold v. Board of County Commissioners of Teton County, 658 P.2d 690, 694 (Wyo. 1983)(followed)
  • McGuire v. McGuire, 608 P.2d 1278, 1286-88 (Wyo. 1980)(distinguished)
  • Walton v. Dana, 609 P.2d 461, 463-64 (Wyo. 1980)(followed)
  • Snell v. Ruppert, 541 P.2d 1042 (Wyo. 1975)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…