Summary
The Texas Business Court denied OWL AssetCo I, LLC’s second motion to remand, holding that EOG Resources, Inc.’s removal was proper and timely under Texas Government Code § 25A.006(f). The court concluded that House Bill 40’s reduction of the Business Court’s amount-in-controversy threshold from $10 million to $5 million supplied facts establishing jurisdiction and triggered a new removal opportunity. The underlying action concerns an alleged breach of a contract for the transportation and disposal of produced water.
Holdings
- The enactment and effective date of House Bill 40's reduction of the amount-in-controversy threshold from $10 million to $5 million constituted a fact establishing the Business Court's jurisdiction over the action.
- EOG's second removal was timely because it filed its second notice of removal two days after House Bill 40's effective date, promptly after the statutory change established Business Court jurisdiction.
- The Business Court had subject-matter jurisdiction over the action under the newly reduced amount-in-controversy threshold.
Questions Presented
- Whether House Bill 40's reduction of the Business Court's amount-in-controversy threshold constituted a fact establishing the Business Court's jurisdiction for purposes of Texas Government Code section 25A.006(f).
- Whether EOG's second removal, filed two days after House Bill 40's effective date, was timely and proper.
- Whether the Business Court had subject-matter jurisdiction over the action under the newly reduced $5 million amount-in-controversy threshold.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (27)
- OWL AssetCo 1, LLC v. EOG Res., Inc., 2025 Tex. Bus. 30 (Tex. Bus. Ct. 8th Div. Aug. 11, 2025)(applied)
- Tellez v. City of Socorro, 226 S.W.3d 413 (Tex. 2007)(followed)
- Diocese of Galveston-Hous. v. Stone, 892 S.W.2d 169 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, no pet.)(followed)
- City of El Paso v. Madero Development, 803 S.W.2d 396 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1991, writ denied)(followed)
- Aleman v. Tex. Med. Bd., 573 S.W.3d 796 (Tex. 2019)(followed)
- Cadena Comercial USA Corp. v. Tex. Alcoholic Beverage Comm'n, 518 S.W.3d 318 (Tex. 2017)(followed)
- Bank Direct Cap. Fin. LLC v. Plasma Fab, LLC, 519 S.W.3d 76 (Tex. 2017)(followed)
- Alex Sheshunoff Mgmt. Servs., L.P. v. Johnson, 209 S.W.3d 644 (Tex. 2006)(followed)
- Molinet v. Kimbrell, 356 S.W.3d 407 (Tex. 2011)(followed)
- In re Estate of Nash, 220 S.W.3d 914 (Tex. 2007)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 27.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…