Summary
The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas considered a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to vacate orders requiring discovery concerning the relator’s net worth. After the parties reached an agreement resolving the issue, the court granted the relator’s unopposed motion to dismiss, lifted the stay, dismissed the original proceeding, and ordered the parties to bear their own costs.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should grant relator's unopposed motion to dismiss its petition for writ of mandamus after the parties reached an agreement resolving the dispute.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- In re Contract Freighters, Inc., 646 S.W.3d 810, 813 (Tex. 2022) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam)(cited)
- Heckman v. Williamson County, 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012)(cited)
- In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…