Summary
The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas denied Antonio G. Cantu’s pro se petition and supplemental petition for writ of mandamus. The court held that Cantu did not meet his burden to establish entitlement to mandamus relief concerning the trial court’s dismissal under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 91a.
Holdings
- The relator was not entitled to mandamus relief because he did not meet his burden to establish the requirements for such relief.
Questions Presented
- Whether Antonio G. Cantu established entitlement to mandamus relief by showing that the trial court clearly abused its discretion in granting a Rule 91a motion to dismiss and that he lacked an adequate remedy on appeal.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (6)
- In re Ill. Nat'l Ins., 685 S.W.3d 826, 834 (Tex. 2024) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- In re Dallas HERO, 698 S.W.3d 242, 247 (Tex. 2024) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
- In re H.E.B. Grocery Co., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam)(followed)
- Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding) (per curiam)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…