In re Fat Cat Boatworks, LLC

In re Fat Cat Boatworks · Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi–Edinburg · June 16, 2026 · No. 13-26-00283-CV

Summary

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas denied Fat Cat Boatworks, LLC’s petition for writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s joinder of claims. The court concluded that the relator had not established an abuse of discretion or the absence of an adequate remedy by appeal.

Holdings

  1. Mandamus relief was unavailable because Fat Cat Boatworks, LLC did not meet its burden to establish the requirements for mandamus relief.
  2. A trial court abuses its discretion when no evidence supports the finding on which its ruling rests or when the court could reasonably have reached only a contrary conclusion.
  3. The adequacy of a relator's remedy at law is evaluated through a benefits-and-detriments analysis.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court clearly abused its discretion by allowing joinder of claims.
  2. Whether Fat Cat Boatworks, LLC lacked an adequate remedy by appeal so as to warrant mandamus relief.

Disposition

writ_denied

Cases Cited (6)

  • In re Ill. Nat’l Ins., 685 S.W.3d 826, 834 (Tex. 2024) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
  • In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 138 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
  • Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839–40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
  • In re AutoZoners, LLC, 694 S.W.3d 219, 223 (Tex. 2024) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam)(followed)
  • In re Auburn Creek Ltd. P’ship, 655 S.W.3d 837, 843 (Tex. 2022) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam)(followed)
  • In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 136–37 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…