Shevirski Johnson v. the State of Texas

No. 13-26-00007-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg May 7, 2026) (mem. op.) · Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi–Edinburg · May 7, 2026 · No. 13-26-00007-CR

Summary

The Thirteenth Court of Appeals of Texas granted the appellant’s motion to withdraw the criminal appeal after trial court findings indicated that the appellant did not wish to prosecute and that the notice of appeal was mistakenly filed. The court suspended the signature requirement for good cause, reinstated the appeal, and dismissed it without reaching the merits.

Court
Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi–Edinburg
Writing for the Court
Ysmael Fonseca; Justice Silva; Justice Peña; Justice Fonseca
Jurisdiction
Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District
Decision date
May 7, 2026
Docket number
13-26-00007-CR
Procedural posture
Criminal appeal dismissed after the appellant moved to withdraw the appeal and the trial court, following abatement, found that appellant did not wish to prosecute and that the notice of appeal had been mistakenly filed.
Precedential value
Unpublished memorandum opinion; not designated for publication under Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Parties
Shevirski Johnson v. The State of Texas
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

appellate procedurecriminal procedure

Practice areas

criminal appellate procedurecriminal procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should suspend the requirement that a motion to dismiss a criminal appeal be signed by both appellant and counsel.
  2. Whether the appeal should be dismissed after the trial court found that appellant did not wish to prosecute it and that the notice of appeal was mistakenly filed.

Holdings

  1. For good cause and based on the trial court's findings following abatement, the court may suspend the requirement that the appellant sign a motion to withdraw or dismiss a criminal appeal.
  2. The appeal was dismissed after the court granted appellant's motion to withdraw, without deciding the merits.

Key quotations

Accordingly, the appeal is hereby reinstated, the motion to withdraw appeal is granted, and, without passing on the merits of the case, the appeal is hereby dismissed. (at 2)

Factual background

Appellant filed a notice of appeal from a criminal judgment of conviction but later failed to file an appellate brief. Following abatement, the trial court found that appellant did not wish to prosecute the appeal and that the notice of appeal had apparently been filed mistakenly. Appellant's motion to withdraw the appeal was not signed by both appellant and counsel.

Procedural history

On December 8, 2025, appellant filed a notice of appeal from a judgment of conviction in Bee County trial court cause number CR2502056. After appellant failed to file a brief, the court of appeals abated the appeal and remanded for findings concerning appellant's desire to prosecute, possible abandonment, and potential ineffective assistance. Based on the trial court's findings, the appellate court reinstated the appeal, suspended the requirement that appellant sign the motion to withdraw, granted the motion, and dismissed the appeal without reaching the merits.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Court Of Appeals Of Texas Thirteenth District Court Of Appeals Of Texas Thirteenth District Corpus C