CaseMax

Coming soon

9 million cases.
One price. Unlimited use.

Search every published U.S. opinion — all 50 states and every federal court — for $59/month per user. No meters, no lock-in. The low-cost alternative to Westlaw and LexisNexis.

$59/month

per user · unlimited use · cancel anytime

  • Search 9+ million published U.S. opinions — every state and every federal court
  • Unlimited searches, views, and reads — no meters, no per-search fees
  • Semantic, keyword, boolean, and citation search with jurisdiction and court filters
  • Full opinion text with headnotes and prior/subsequent history
  • Cancel anytime — month-to-month, no annual lock-in

Coming soon. Join the waitlist — be first to get unlimited CaseMax at $59.

9M+

Total opinions

published U.S. decisions

All 50

State coverage

+ D.C. & territories

All fed.

Federal coverage

SCOTUS to District Courts

Daily

Updated

new opinions indexed every day

Federal courts — all of them

  • U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS)
  • 13 U.S. Courts of Appeals
  • U.S. District Courts (94 districts)
  • U.S. Bankruptcy Courts
  • U.S. Court of Federal Claims & Court of International Trade

State courts — all 50 states

  • All 50 state supreme courts
  • State intermediate appellate courts
  • State trial courts (where opinions are published)
  • D.C. Court of Appeals & territorial courts

How CaseMax compares

Westlaw and LexisNexis are excellent — and priced like it. CaseMax matches their coverage with no annual contract and no enterprise negotiation.

FeatureCaseMaxWestlawLexisNexis
Monthly price (per user)$59$350 - $600*$350 - $600*
ContractMonth-to-monthAnnualAnnual
Cancel anytime
State case coverageAll 50 statesAll 50 statesAll 50 states
Federal case coverageAll federal courtsAll federal courtsAll federal courts
Citation verification includedKeyCite (separate)Shepard's (separate)
AI / natural-language search

* Westlaw Edge and Lexis+ list pricing varies by plan, firm size, and negotiation; $350-$600/mo per user is a representative range from published and analyst-reported plans as of 2025-2026. KeyCite and Shepard's are core to those platforms but often tiered or metered by plan. CaseMax pricing is flat at $59/mo per user with no annual commitment.

See what CaseMax delivers — real case, real analysis

Every opinion in CaseMax comes with LLM-generated analysis — holdings, reasoning, and treatment — so you can triage 50 cases in the time it used to take to read five. Example below: Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

The case

Brown v. Board of Education

347 U.S. 483 (1954) · Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 17, 1954 · Warren, C.J., unanimous

Facts: Plaintiffs, Black children in Topeka, Kansas and other districts, were denied admission to public schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting racial segregation. They sought admission on the ground that segregation deprived them of equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment, even though the physical facilities and other tangible factors were equalized.

“We conclude that, in the field of public education, the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”

Holding: Racial segregation of public schools violates the Equal Protection Clause. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), as applied to public education, is overruled in that context.

Opinion: full text, headnotes, and subsequent history available in CaseMax. Cited by 30,000+ later opinions.

LLM-generated analysis

TL;DR

Unanimous SCOTUS ends de jure school segregation. The Court holds that separating children in public schools solely by race — even with equal tangible resources — deprives minority children of equal educational opportunity and violates equal protection.

Issues & holdings

  • Issue: Does segregation of public schools by race violate the Fourteenth Amendment when facilities are otherwise equal?
  • Holding: Yes — 9-0. Separate is inherently unequal in public education. Judgment for plaintiffs; remanded for decree.
  • Overrules (in part): Plessy's separate-but-equal as applied to public schools.

Reasoning (distilled)

  1. Education is the most important function of state and local government.
  2. Segregation generates a feeling of inferiority that retards motivation and learning.
  3. Tangible equalization cannot cure the intangible, stigmatic harm.
  4. Therefore the classification is not reasonable and fails equal protection.

Why it matters for your research

  • ·Foundation for all modern equal-protection doctrine — cited in 30k+ cases.
  • ·CaseMax flags every citing case, treatment (followed/distinguished), and subsequent history.
  • ·Semantic search finds it by concept (“school segregation equal protection”) not just citation.

The low-cost alternative to Westlaw and LexisNexis

If you are searching for an alternative to Westlaw or an alternative to LexisNexis, CaseMax was built for you. For years the only way to get comprehensive U.S. caselaw — every state, every federal court — was an enterprise contract at $350 to $600 per user per month, with annual lock-in and metered retrievals.

Low-cost legal case research should not mean incomplete research. CaseMax gives solos, small firms, and litigators who live in the reporters the same 9M+ opinion corpus that powers BigLaw research — searchable by keyword, boolean, citation, and natural language — for $59 per user per month, unlimited, cancel anytime. No per-search fees, no annual commitment, no retention call to cancel.

Looking for a Lexis alternative or Westlaw alternative that actually replaces your daily workflow? CaseMax covers SCOTUS, all 13 Circuits, all 94 District Courts, Bankruptcy Courts, and every publishing state court — with headnotes, prior and subsequent history, and LLM-generated holdings and reasoning on every opinion. It is affordable legal research without cutting coverage.

Who CaseMax is for

Solo & small firms

Westlaw-grade coverage without the Westlaw invoice. One flat fee your bookkeeper will love.

Litigators who live in the reporters

Unlimited deep dives — no watching a search counter or rationing retrievals before month-end.

Researchers & academics

Full headnotes and history for empirical work, without an enterprise license.

Any lawyer who needs an affordable alternative to Westlaw or Lexis

Low-cost legal case research with the same courts, better search, and no enterprise contract.

One subscription. Every case.

CaseMax is coming soon. Be first in line — and lock in early-access updates.