Summary
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit considered whether Auto-Train Corporation's pre-bankruptcy payment of employee withholding taxes to the District of Columbia was made from trust funds or constituted a voidable preference under the Bankruptcy Code. The court held that payment of funds covered by a statutory trust provision, without more, does not create a trust for purposes of 11 U.S.C. § 541, particularly where the debtor did not segregate or trace the funds.
Holdings
- A prepetition payment of withholding taxes made after the applicable 45-day period may be recovered as a preferential transfer when the payment was made from estate property, unless the funds are traceable to a trust excluded from the estate.
- The mere fact of prepetition payment of funds covered by a statutory trust provision does not, without more, create a trust for purposes of § 541 or exclude the payment from the bankruptcy estate.
- For a late prepetition tax payment, courts should use reasonable assumptions in tracing funds to a statutory trust, but the mere act of payment is not a reasonable assumption when the payment has no prior relationship to withheld tax funds.
Questions Presented
- Whether a prepetition payment of withholding taxes made within the preference period was an avoidable preference under 11 U.S.C. § 547.
- Whether the mere fact that Auto-Train paid funds covered by a statutory trust provision was sufficient to establish that the payment was made from trust property excluded from the bankruptcy estate under 11 U.S.C. § 541.
- What tracing standard applies to prepetition tax payments made after the applicable 45-day ordinary-course period under the pre-1984 Bankruptcy Code.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (23)
- In re Auto-Train Corp., Inc., 810 F.2d 270 (D.C. Cir. 1987)(followed)
- United States v. Randall, 401 U.S. 513 (1971)(followed and clarified)
- In re Kennedy & Cohen, Inc., 612 F.2d 963 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 833 (1980)(discussed)
- Lusk Corp. v. Arizona State Tax Commission, 462 F.2d 187 (9th Cir. 1972)(discussed)
- England v. United States (Matter of Shakesteers Coffee Shops), 546 F.2d 821 (9th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 974 (1977)(discussed)
- In re Tamasha Town & Country Club, 483 F.2d 1377 (9th Cir. 1973)(discussed)
- In re Rohar Associates, Inc., 375 F. Supp. 637 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)(distinguished)
- In re Rodriguez, 50 B.R. 576 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. 1985)(rejected)
- In re Razorback Ready-Mix Concrete Co., 45 B.R. 917 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1984)(rejected)
- In re Olympic Foundry Co., 63 B.R. 324 (Bankr. W.D. Wash. 1986), rev'd on other grounds, 71 B.R. 216 (Bankr. 9th Cir. 1987)(partially followed)
Showing top 10 of 23.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…