Summary
The D.C. Circuit held that a district court order requiring a foreign sovereign to brief the merits of an arbitral award confirmation petition before resolving a colorable assertion of sovereign immunity is immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine. The court further held that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act requires threshold resolution of immunity before a sovereign may be compelled to defend on the merits, and the Federal Arbitration Act does not mandate simultaneous briefing of immunity and merits issues. The case involved Nigeria's challenge to a $9 billion arbitral award, with the court finding Nigeria's immunity defense colorable under the arbitration and waiver exceptions.
Holdings
- The order is immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine because it conclusively rejects the sovereign's assertion of immunity from having to defend the merits, resolves an important question separate from the merits, and is effectively unreviewable on appeal from final judgment.
- The district court erred because the FSIA requires a threshold determination of immunity before a foreign sovereign can be compelled to defend the merits. The FAA does not require simultaneous briefing of immunity and merits issues.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court's order requiring the foreign sovereign to brief the merits before resolving its immunity assertion is immediately appealable under the collateral-order doctrine.
- Whether the district court erred in requiring the foreign sovereign to present merits arguments before resolving its colorable assertion of sovereign immunity.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (26)
- Kilburn v. Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 376 F.3d 1123 (D.C. Cir. 2004)(cited)
- Price v. Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 294 F.3d 82 (D.C. Cir. 2002)(cited)
- Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 905 F.2d 438 (D.C. Cir. 1990)(cited)
- Phoenix Consulting, Inc. v. Republic of Angola, 216 F.3d 36 (D.C. Cir. 2000)(cited)
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83 (1998)(cited)
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Mich. Ry. v. Swan, 111 U.S. 379 (1884)(cited)
- Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229 (1945)(cited)
- Mohawk Indus. Inc. v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100 (2009)(cited)
- Butler v. Sukhoi Co., 579 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2009)(cited)
- United States v. Moats, 961 F.2d 1198 (5th Cir. 1992)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 26.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.