Summary
This consolidated order from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit addresses emergency motions for administrative stays filed by multiple appellants. After reviewing the motions, oppositions, and replies, the court denied the requests for stays. The underlying cases involve legal challenges brought by federal officials and board members against high-ranking executive branch appointees.
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Writing for the Court
Henderson; Millett; Walker
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Decision date
March 30, 2025
Docket number
25-5037
Procedural posture
Emergency motions for administrative stay were denied.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Scott Bessent, Donald J. Trump, Marvin E. Kaplan v. Cathy A. Harris, Gwynne A. Wilcox
Disposition
other
Topics
administrative lawappellate procedure
Practice areas
administrative lawfederal employment lawappellate procedure
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should grant the emergency motions for administrative stay.
Holdings
- The court denied the emergency motions for administrative stay.
Key quotations
“ORDERED that the motions be denied.” (2)
Procedural history
Consolidated appeals filed March 30, 2025; the court considered emergency motions for administrative stay.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…