Summary
This per curiam order from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit resolves an emergency motion for a stay pending appeal involving officials from the National Credit Union Administration and the Department of the Treasury. The court dissolved an existing administrative stay, granted the emergency motion, and expedited the appeal. It establishes a tight briefing schedule, directs the clerk to calendar oral argument after briefing concludes, and notes that dispositive motions will not be considered due to the expedited timeline.
Topics
Practice areas
Questions Presented
- Whether the appellants satisfied the requirements for a stay pending appeal
Holdings
- The emergency motion for stay pending appeal is granted and the prior administrative stay is dissolved.
Key quotations
“Appellants have satisfied the stringent requirements for a stay pending appeal. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009); D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 33 (2025).”
Factual background
The court considered an emergency motion for a stay pending appeal concerning the parties' dispute arising from actions in the district court.
Procedural history
The appeal arises from United States District Court for the District of Columbia, case No. 1:25-cv-01294-AHA. The parties filed an emergency motion for a stay pending appeal.