In re: U.S. DOGE Service

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit · May 14, 2025 · No. 25-5130

Summary

The D.C. Circuit denied the government's petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to halt limited district court discovery into whether the U.S. Digital Service constitutes an agency under the Freedom of Information Act. The court dissolved an administrative stay and dismissed the stay motion as moot, concluding that the government failed to establish a clear right to mandamus relief or demonstrate the absence of adequate alternative remedies. The memorandum notes that the government forfeited its separation-of-powers objections by failing to raise them in the district court and emphasizes that FOIA agency status depends on a functional analysis of the entity's actual authority.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Writing for the Court
Henderson; Wilkins; Childs
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Decision date
May 14, 2025
Docket number
25-5130
Procedural posture
Petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to halt the district court's order for limited discovery under the Freedom of Information Act.
Standard of review
abuse of discretion
Precedential value
unpublished
Parties
U.S. DOGE Service
Disposition
other

Topics

appellate jurisdictionappellate procedurecivil procedurejudicial review of agency actionadministrative procedure act

Practice areas

administrative lawconstitutional lawcivil procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the petition for a writ of mandamus should be granted to halt the district court's limited discovery order.

Holdings

  1. The petition for mandamus is denied; the administrative stay is dissolved and the stay motion is dismissed as moot.

Key quotations

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, appropriate only when the petitioner can show that (1) it has no other adequate means to attain the relief it desires, (2) its right to the writ is clear and indisputable, and (3) issuance of the writ is appropriate under the circumstances. (at 1)
Accordingly, we will deny mandamus even if a petitioner’s argument, though ‘pack[ing] substantial force,’ is not clearly mandated by statutory authority or case law. (at 2)

Factual background

The government sought to stop a district court order that allowed limited discovery into the United States DOGE Service (USDS) to determine if USDS is an "agency" under FOIA. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) had initiated the underlying FOIA suit seeking records about USDS. The government argued the discovery intruded on presidential prerogatives, but offered no substantive privilege objections.

Procedural history

The district court entered an order permitting limited discovery to determine whether the United States DOGE Service is an agency under FOIA. The United States government filed a petition for mandamus in the D.C. Circuit challenging that order. The Circuit denied the petition and dissolved an administrative stay.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…