Secretary of Labor v. Industrial Turnaround Corporation

138 F.4th 1339 · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit · June 3, 2025 · No. 24-1058

Summary

The D.C. Circuit dismissed the Secretary of Labor’s petition for review of a Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission order that reopened a final civil penalty assessment against an independent contractor. The court held that the Commission’s order remanding the case for further proceedings was nonfinal and did not satisfy the requirements of the collateral order doctrine for interlocutory appellate review. Consequently, the court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal at this stage.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Writing for the Court
Senior Circuit Judge GINSBURG; RAO; PAN; GINSBURG
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Decision date
June 3, 2025
Docket number
24-1058
Procedural posture
Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Precedential value
published
Parties
Secretary of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration v. Industrial Turnaround Corporation and Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

appellate jurisdictionstandard of reviewadministrative lawstatutory interpretation

Practice areas

administrative lawappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Commission’s order reopening a final penalty assessment is an appealable collateral order.

Holdings

  1. The Commission’s order is not an appealable collateral order and the petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Key quotations

We hold the Commission’s order is not an appealable collateral order and therefore dismiss the Secretary’s petition for lack of jurisdiction. (at 1)

Factual background

In August 2022 a bin of phosphate rock collapsed at the Lee Creek Mine injuring three miners. MSHA issued a citation to Industrial Turnaround Corporation (ITAC) and later mailed a proposed penalty to ITAC’s outdated address of record, which became final after 30 days because ITAC did not contest it. ITAC later moved to reopen the penalty, citing excusable neglect under FRCP 60(b), and the Commission granted the motion.

Procedural history

The Commission reopened a final penalty assessment after the operator failed to contest the notice; the Secretary appealed the reopening order to the D.C. Circuit.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…