Summary
In Lanford v. Phemister, the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal held that Florida’s constitutional homestead protections prohibit using proceeds from the sale of a decedent’s protected homestead to pay personal representative fees and estate administration expenses, because the homestead passes outside the probate estate. However, the court affirmed that trustee fees and costs incurred in administering a testamentary trust that holds the homestead proceeds may be reimbursed from those proceeds under Florida trust law. The court also declined to disturb the reasonableness determination due to the absence of a hearing transcript, applying the Applegate rule.
Holdings
- The probate court erred in allowing reimbursement of Phemister's personal representative fees and costs from the homestead sale proceeds because Florida's constitutional homestead provisions forbid it.
- The trial court correctly allowed reimbursement of Phemister's fees and costs as testamentary trustee from the homestead sale proceeds.
- The court will not disturb the probate court's determination that fees and costs were reasonable and incurred for the testamentary trust's benefit because there are no transcripts of the evidentiary hearing.
Questions Presented
- Whether the probate court erred in authorizing reimbursement of personal representative fees and costs from homestead sale proceeds.
- Whether the probate court correctly allowed reimbursement of trustee fees and costs from homestead sale proceeds.
- Whether the fees and costs awarded were reasonable.
Disposition
affirmed in part; reversed in part
Cases Cited (11)
- Anderson v. Letosky, 304 So. 3d 801 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)(applied)
- Morey v. Everbank, Morey v. Everbank, 93 So. 3d 482 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)(relied_upon)
- Est. of Shefner v. Shefner-Holden, 2 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)(relied_upon)
- Dorothy M. Clifton v. Lonnie R. Clifton, Sr., et ux., et al., Clifton v. Clifton, 553 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)(relied_upon)
- Thompson v. Laney, 766 So. 2d 1087 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(applied)
- Bronstein v. Bronstein, 332 So. 3d 510 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)(applied)
- Genna Demircan v. Igor Mikhaylov, Demircan v. Mikhaylov, 306 So. 3d 142 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)(applied)
- Charles Barnett v. William R. Barnett, Barnett v. Barnett, 340 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)(applied)
- Hicks v. Am. Integrity Ins. of Fla., 241 So. 3d 925 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)(applied)
- Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)(applied)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.