Dennis Markly Bryan v. State of Florida

947 So. 2d 1270 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District · February 2, 2007 · No. 5D05-3363

Summary

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed Dennis Markly Bryan's convictions and consecutive life sentences for first-degree murder and armed robbery. The court held that the trial court properly admitted collateral-crime evidence and correctly denied suppression of Bryan's confession because Bryan initiated further communication after invoking his right to counsel and knowingly and voluntarily waived that right.

Court
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Writing for the Court
Evander, J.; Griffin, J.; Palmer, J.
Jurisdiction
Florida
Decision date
February 2, 2007
Docket number
5D05-3363
Procedural posture
Direct appeal from convictions for first-degree murder and armed robbery with a firearm or other deadly weapon, and consecutive life sentences.
Standard of review
Admission of collateral-crime evidence is reviewed for abuse of discretion. The voluntariness and knowing nature of a post-invocation waiver of counsel are assessed under the totality of the circumstances.
Precedential value
Published Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal opinion
Parties
Dennis Markly Bryan v. State of Florida
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

suppression of evidenceright to counselsixth amendmentevidencecriminal procedure

Practice areas

Criminal lawCriminal procedureEvidenceConstitutional law

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of uncharged collateral crimes when the evidence was alleged to be inextricably intertwined with the charged offenses and did not become the feature of the trial.
  2. Whether Bryan's confession was admissible under the Sixth Amendment after he initially invoked his right to counsel but later initiated further communication and waived counsel.

Holdings

  1. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting evidence of the collateral crimes because the evidence was inextricably intertwined with the charged offenses and did not become the feature of the trial.
  2. Bryan's confession was admissible because he initiated the subsequent conversation with law enforcement and knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to counsel under the totality of the circumstances.

Key quotations

First, the trial court must find the suspect initiated the subsequent conversation with law enforcement. Second, the trial court must find, based on the totality of the circumstances, the suspect knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to counsel. (947 So. 2d at 1272)
The evidence further supported the trial court's conclusion that, based on the totality of the circumstances, appellant had knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to counsel after initially invoking such right. (947 So. 2d at 1273)

Factual background

Bryan and co-defendant David Baumann were alleged to have robbed a Subway in St. Augustine, during which a Subway employee was shot and killed. While Bryan was detained in Kentucky on an unrelated matter, Florida detectives questioned him about the Subway robbery and murder; Bryan invoked his right to counsel, and the detectives stopped questioning him. After an ATF agent told Bryan that the detectives would likely believe Baumann's account, Bryan asked that the detectives return, waived his right to counsel, and made incriminating statements.

Procedural history

Bryan was indicted for first-degree murder and armed robbery after a Subway robbery in which an employee was killed. A jury found him guilty as charged, recommended life imprisonment without parole on the murder count, and the trial court imposed two consecutive life sentences. Bryan appealed, challenging the admission of collateral-crime evidence and the denial of his motion to suppress statements made after he initially invoked his right to counsel.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from Florida District Court Of Appeal Of Florida Fifth District