Summary
The Florida District Court of Appeal held that a petition under sections 733.6175 or 736.0206, Florida Statutes, seeking a refund or surcharge against a fiduciary individually for excessive fees is an adversary proceeding that requires formal notice under Florida Probate Rule 5.025 to obtain personal jurisdiction. The court reasoned that such a proceeding imposes personal liability tantamount to a judgment for damages, distinguishing it from in rem probate administration.
Holdings
- A proceeding seeking an order or judgment imposing a refund or surcharge against a fiduciary or a fiduciary's agent, individually, for breach of fiduciary duty by charging excessive fees is tantamount to a judgment for damages and requires personal service on the fiduciary as an individual by formal notice under the Florida Probate Rules; absent a written waiver, formal notice served on the respondent individually is required for such a proceeding.
Questions Presented
- Whether a proceeding filed in a probate case under sections 733.6175 or 736.0206, Florida Statutes, seeking a refund or surcharge against a fiduciary individually, constitutes an adversary proceeding requiring service by formal notice under the Florida Probate Rules.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (9)
- Kent v. Marmorstein, 120 So. 3d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)(applied)
- Reed v. Long, Reed v. Long, 111 So. 3d 237 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)(relied_upon)
- Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby, 862 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)(analogized)
- Miller v. Miller, 89 So. 3d 962 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012)(relied_upon)
- In re Estate of Winston v. Winston, 610 So. 2d 1323 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)(relied_upon)
- Beck v. Beck, Beck v. Beck, 383 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)(relied_upon)
- State v. Lahurd, 632 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)(cited)
- In re Estate of Pearce, 507 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)(cited)
- Taylor v. Mercedes, 760 So. 2d 282 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)(cited)
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…