Summary
The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal dismissed Itzhak Bak’s appeal as untimely. The court held that the thirty-day appeal period ran from rendition of the non-final status report order, and that a motion for reconsideration did not suspend rendition because rehearing is not authorized for non-final orders.
Holdings
- A motion for rehearing does not suspend rendition of a nonfinal order because rehearing is not authorized for nonfinal orders.
- The appeal had to be dismissed because Bak did not file his notice of appeal within thirty days after rendition of the status report order.
Questions Presented
- Whether the appeal was timely when the notice of appeal was filed more than thirty days after rendition of the nonfinal status report order.
- Whether a motion for rehearing or reconsideration suspended rendition of the nonfinal status report order and extended the time for appeal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Wegner v. Schillinger, 921 So. 2d 854, 855 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)(followed)
- Hunt v. Forbes, 65 So. 3d 133, 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…