Summary
The Florida Second District Court of Appeal held that an arbitration agreement signed upon admission to a skilled nursing facility remained valid and enforceable despite portions of the executed copy being obscured by a photocopying error. The court concluded that the agreement contained sufficient terms to establish the parties’ intent to arbitrate and that statutory provisions could address any gap concerning the selection of a neutral arbitrator. The court reversed and remanded with directions to grant the motion to compel arbitration.
Holdings
- The arbitration agreement was valid and enforceable because the unobscured provisions, read as a whole, sufficiently demonstrated the parties' intent to arbitrate and supplied definite terms concerning the matters to be arbitrated and the procedure for arbitration.
- An arbitration agreement is enforceable when the signatory has a meaningful opportunity to review it, obtain guidance, and accept or reject its terms; on these facts, Raymond had such an opportunity and signed with a clear intent to arbitrate potential disputes.
Questions Presented
- Whether an arbitration agreement remains valid and enforceable when portions of the executed copy, including the title, part of the arbitration-panel procedure, and part of a severability clause, are obscured by a photocopying error.
- Whether the Florida Arbitration Code supplies or cures the omitted procedural term concerning selection of a neutral arbitrator or umpire.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (9)
- Zephyr Haven Health & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Hardin, 122 So. 3d 916, 919 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), review denied, 135 So. 3d 287 (Fla. 2014)(followed)
- Woebse v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America, 977 So. 2d 630, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)(followed)
- Bland, ex rel. Coker v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America, 927 So. 2d 252, 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)(followed)
- Shotts v. OP Winter Haven, Inc., 86 So. 3d 456 (Fla. 2011)(limited)
- Bergman v. DeIulio, 826 So. 2d 500, 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(followed)
- Malone & Hyde, Inc. v. RTC Transportation, Inc., 515 So. 2d 365, 366 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)(followed)
- Crastvell Trading Ltd. v. Marengere, 90 So. 3d 349, 353 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)(followed)
- SCG Harbourwood, LLC v. Hanyan, 93 So. 3d 1197, 1200 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)(followed)
- Tampa HCP, LLC v. Bachor, 72 So. 3d 323, 328 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…