Summary
The Florida Second District Court of Appeal partially affirmed a trial court order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i). The court dismissed claims unrelated to determining the trial court’s personal jurisdiction over Edward Adkins and otherwise affirmed the order in part.
Topics
Practice areas
Questions Presented
- Whether the appellate court could review the trial court's order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i).
- What disposition was appropriate for claims unrelated to the determination of personal jurisdiction over Edward Adkins.
Holdings
- The court affirmed the trial court's order in part and dismissed all claims unrelated to the determination of the trial court's personal jurisdiction over Edward Adkins.
Factual background
The opinion provides no substantive factual background beyond identifying claims involving dissolved limited liability partnerships and in rem funds. The appeal concerned the trial court's determination of personal jurisdiction over Edward Adkins.
Procedural history
Adkins appealed a nonfinal order entered by the Circuit Court for Lee County. The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, affirmed the order in part and dismissed claims unrelated to the determination of personal jurisdiction over Adkins.