Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal granted a petition for certiorari and quashed an order striking the plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial. The court held that amending the complaint to seek damages exceeding the county court’s jurisdictional limit and transferring the case to circuit court created a new action in which the plaintiff timely demanded a jury trial.
Holdings
- When a complaint is amended with leave of court to allege damages exceeding the county court's jurisdictional limit and the action is transferred to circuit court, the cause becomes a new action, allowing the plaintiff to make a timely jury demand with the amended complaint under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.430(b), even if the plaintiff previously waived a jury in the county court action.
- The district court may grant certiorari to review a trial court order striking a jury demand when the order departs from the essential requirements of law.
Questions Presented
- Whether a plaintiff who waived a jury trial in a county court action may make a timely jury demand when the complaint is amended to allege damages exceeding the county court's jurisdictional limit and the action is transferred to circuit court.
- Whether striking the timely jury demand constituted a departure from the essential requirements of law warranting certiorari relief.
Disposition
quashed
Cases Cited (4)
- Valiante v. Allstate Insurance Co., 462 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)(followed)
- Magram v. Raffel, 443 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)(followed)
- Spring v. Ronel Refining, Inc., 421 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)(followed)
- Hollywood, Inc. v. City of Hollywood, 321 So. 2d 65 (Fla. 1975)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…