United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Buchwald Jewelers

476 So. 2d 772 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District · October 15, 1985 · No. 85-574

Summary

United Parcel Service appealed a summary judgment awarding Buchwald Jewelers $14,600 for breach of contract after UPS accepted a cashier’s check instead of the cash-only payment specified in the C.O.D. instructions. The court held that Buchwald Jewelers did not ratify UPS’s unauthorized act because it accepted the check without knowing that UPS had violated the cash-only requirement. The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment.

Holdings

  1. A principal does not ratify an agent's unauthorized act unless the principal was fully informed of the material facts and approved the act. Buchwald Jewelers's acceptance and deposit of the cashier's check did not constitute ratification because it undisputedly lacked knowledge that UPS had violated the cash-only instruction.
  2. The final summary judgment awarding Buchwald Jewelers damages for UPS's breach of contract was affirmed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Buchwald Jewelers ratified UPS's unauthorized acceptance of a cashier's check, thereby waiving the contractual requirement that UPS collect cash only.
  2. Whether summary judgment for Buchwald Jewelers on its breach-of-contract claim was proper.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (4)

  • Ball v. Yates, 158 Fla. 521, 29 So. 2d 729 (1946), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 774, 68 S. Ct. 66, 92 L. Ed. 359 (1947)(followed)
  • Pedro Realty, Inc. v. Silva, 399 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)(followed)
  • Bach v. State Board of Dentistry, 378 So. 2d 34 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)(followed)
  • G & M Restaurants Corp. v. Tropical Music Service, Inc., 161 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…