Summary
The Florida Third District Court of Appeal held that proceeds from the sale of homestead property devised directly to a qualified heir remained exempt from the decedent's creditors' claims and estate administrative expenses. The court also held that the devisees were entitled to attorney's fees and expenses for successfully defending a Slayer Statute claim because their defense effectuated the decedent's testamentary intent. The court affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Holdings
- Homestead property devised directly to a qualified heir passes outside the probate estate, and the heir's subsequent sale of the property does not make the proceeds available to satisfy the decedent's creditors' claims or the estate's administrative expenses when the will did not direct a sale.
- Beneficiaries who successfully defend a Slayer Statute claim are entitled under section 733.106(3), Florida Statutes, to reimbursement from the estate for reasonable attorney's fees and expenses when their defense effectuates the decedent's testamentary intent.
Questions Presented
- Whether homestead property devised directly to a qualified heir remains protected from the decedent's creditors' claims and estate administrative expenses after the heir sells the property.
- Whether beneficiaries who successfully defend a Slayer Statute claim are entitled to attorney's fees and expenses under section 733.106(3), Florida Statutes.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (14)
- Public Health Trust of Dade County v. Lopez, Public Health Trust of Dade County v. Lopez, 531 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 1988)(followed)
- Michael Engelke v. Estate of Paul Engelke, Engelke v. Engelke, 921 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)(followed)
- Thompson v. Laney, 766 So. 2d 1087, 1088 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(followed)
- Kelli Snyder, Petitioner, v. Kent W. Davis, etc., Respondent, Snyder v. Davis, 699 So. 2d 999, 1003 (Fla. 1997)(followed)
- Thomas McKean, et al. v. Peter Warburton, McKean v. Warburton, 919 So. 2d 341, 347 (Fla. 2005)(followed)
- In re ESTATE OF Jack HAMEL, Karyn H. White, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jack Hamel, Appellant, v. Theodore Parker, P.A., a Florida corporation, Appellee, Estate of Hamel v. Parker, 821 So. 2d 1276, 1280 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)(followed)
- In re Estate of Tudhope, 595 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)(followed)
- Knadle v. Estate of Knadle, 686 So. 2d 631, 632 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)(distinguished)
- Elmowitz v. Estate of Zimmerman, 647 So. 2d 1064, 1065 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)(distinguished)
- Estate of Brock v. Brock, 695 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 14.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…