Casa Inv. Co., Inc. v. Nestor

8 So. 3d 1219 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) · District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District · April 29, 2009 · No. No. 3D08-2310

Summary

The Florida Third District Court of Appeal granted Casa Investment Co., Inc.'s petition for second-level certiorari and quashed a circuit court appellate division decision affirming summary judgment for Marcel Nestor. The court held that an ore tenus motion for summary judgment violated Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c)'s written-service and 20-day notice requirements, depriving Casa of due process.

Holdings

  1. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c) does not permit an oral motion for summary judgment. A summary-judgment motion must be served in writing, state its grounds with particularity, identify the relied-upon evidence, and be served at least 20 days before the hearing.
  2. Granting summary judgment on Nestor's improperly noticed oral motion deprived Casa of due process and constituted a departure from the essential requirements of law; the appellate division's affirmance was therefore quashed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether an oral, ore tenus motion for summary judgment may be granted when the motion was not written, served, and noticed at least 20 days before the hearing as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.510(c).
  2. Whether granting the improperly noticed oral summary-judgment motion deprived Casa of due process and constituted a departure from the essential requirements of law warranting second-level certiorari.

Disposition

quashed

Cases Cited (5)

  • Williams v. Miami-Dade County, 969 So. 2d 389, 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)(followed)
  • Loguercio v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 907 So. 2d 1267 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)(followed)
  • Haines City Community Development v. Heggs, 658 So. 2d 523, 528 (Fla. 1995)(followed)
  • City of Cooper City v. Sunshine Wireless Co., 654 So. 2d 283, 284 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)(followed)
  • State, Florida Highway Patrol v. In re: Forfeiture of Twenty Nine Thousand Nine Hundred & Eighty ($29,980.00) in U.S. Currency, 802 So. 2d 1171, 1172-73 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…