United States v. Yuri Chachanko

United States v. Chachanko, No. 24-2440 (8th Cir. Dec. 17, 2025) · United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · December 18, 2025 · No. 24-2440

Summary

The Eighth Circuit affirmed the denial of Yuri Chachanko's motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13. The court held that the phrase "the term of imprisonment" refers only to the South Dakota sentence Chachanko sought to reduce, so his time served on a consecutive Montana sentence did not satisfy the 10-year eligibility requirement. The court also concluded that his medical conditions and related circumstances did not warrant relief.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Stras, Circuit Judge; Benton, Circuit Judge; Grasz, Circuit Judge
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decision date
December 18, 2025
Docket number
24-2440
Procedural posture
Chachanko appealed the District of South Dakota's denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13.
Standard of review
The court reviewed the interpretation of the statute and Sentencing Guidelines de novo and reviewed the denial of relief based on medical conditions for abuse of discretion.
Precedential value
Published and precedential
Parties
Yuri Chachanko v. United States of America
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

sentence modificationsentencingpost-conviction reliefstatutory interpretationappellate procedure

Practice areas

criminal proceduresentencingpost-conviction reliefstatutory interpretationappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the phrase "the term of imprisonment" in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(6) permits time served on a separate, consecutive sentence to count toward the requirement that the prisoner have served at least ten years of the sentence sought to be reduced.
  2. Whether Chachanko's medical conditions constituted extraordinary and compelling reasons for a sentence reduction under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(1).
  3. Whether Chachanko's medical conditions qualified under the catch-all provision in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(5).

Holdings

  1. For purposes of U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(6), "the term of imprisonment" refers to the specific sentence the prisoner seeks to reduce, not the aggregate of consecutive sentences imposed in separate cases. Time served on Chachanko's Montana sentence therefore did not count toward the ten-year requirement for his South Dakota sentence.
  2. The district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Chachanko's medical conditions did not qualify as extraordinary and compelling reasons for a sentence reduction.
  3. The district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Chachanko's medical conditions, considered individually and in combination, were not similar in gravity to the listed reasons for compassionate release under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13(b)(5).

Key quotations

Although Gamble was hoping to reduce a sentence he had already served and Chachanko one he had just started, both defendants tried to rely on the same administrative statute to have two sentences “joined as one.” (at 6)
We accordingly affirm the judgment of the district court. (at 8)

Factual background

Chachanko participated in a multistate crime spree involving armed robberies and firearm offenses. He received a 219-month sentence in Montana and a consecutive 300-month sentence in South Dakota for using a firearm during a crime of violence. After the First Step Act permitted prisoners to seek sentence reductions, he moved to reduce the South Dakota sentence based on its alleged unusual length and his head injury, depression, and bipolar disorder. He had served approximately seventeen years overall but had only recently begun serving the South Dakota sentence.

Procedural history

Chachanko, serving consecutive federal sentences imposed in Montana and South Dakota, moved in the South Dakota case for compassionate release or a sentence reduction under the First Step Act. The district court concluded that he had not served at least ten years of the South Dakota sentence and that his medical conditions did not constitute extraordinary and compelling reasons under the Sentencing Guidelines, including the catch-all provision. The Eighth Circuit affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…