Dish Network L.L.C. v. Gaby Fraifer

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · August 6, 2026 · No. 24-10223

Summary

This Eleventh Circuit opinion affirms a district court's judgment in favor of DISH Network L.L.C. in a copyright infringement lawsuit against defendants who retransmitted Arabic-language programming without authorization. The court addresses the validity of foreign copyright registrations, the transfer of ownership rights under U.S. law, and finds that the defendants' use of encoders constituted direct copyright infringement. Additionally, the court upholds the admission of the plaintiff's expert testimony regarding the technical methods of transmission.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Writing for the Court
Branch; Abudu; Kidd
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
August 6, 2026
Docket number
24-10223
Procedural posture
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Standard of review
De novo for the district court's summary‑judgment rulings; clear error for findings of fact; abuse of discretion for evidentiary rulings.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Gaby Fraifer, Tele-Center, Inc., Planet Telecom, Inc. v. Dish Network L.L.C.
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

copyright lawcopyright infringementevidenceappellate procedurestatutory interpretation

Practice areas

intellectual property

Questions Presented

  1. Whether DISH holds valid copyright ownership in the registered audiovisual works.
  2. Whether the defendants directly infringed DISH's copyrights by using encoders and CDNs to transmit the works in the United States.
  3. Whether the district court erred in admitting the expert testimony and related evidentiary exhibits.
  4. Whether the district court erred in finding that the transmissions occurred in the United States.

Holdings

  1. DIS H has established ownership of the registered works through the statutory presumption of validity and by showing that the works are collective works under UAE law, so MBC’s initial ownership transferred to DISH.
  2. The defendants' use of encoders constituted direct copyright infringement, and the district court did not err in finding infringement.
  3. The district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the expert testimony and the monitoring reports, screenshots, and related exhibits.
  4. The district court correctly found that the protected works were transmitted in the United States.

Key quotations

We are not persuaded by any of the challenges, so we affirm the district court’s judgment. (1)
The district court properly admitted the monitoring reports and screenshots into evidence over the defendants’ hearsay objection. (22)

Factual background

DIS H holds exclusive U.S. rights to several Arabic‑language television channels supplied by MBC. The defendants operated the UlaiTV and AhlaiTV services, captured the protected channels, transcoded them, and delivered the streams to U.S. customers via set‑top boxes using CDNs and encoders. DISH sued for copyright infringement and obtained a favorable judgment at trial.

Procedural history

The district court granted summary judgment on ownership, found a genuine issue of fact on infringement, proceeded to a bench trial, and entered judgment for DISH awarding a permanent injunction, statutory damages, attorney fees, and costs.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…