In re: Kathryn Stillwell Dressler

No. 26-10221 · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · March 11, 2026 · No. No. 26-10221

Summary

The Eleventh Circuit dismissed Kathryn Stillwell Dressler’s pro se petition for a writ of mandamus as moot. The court held that the transfer of her underlying case from the Southern District of Georgia to the Southern District of Florida meant it could no longer provide meaningful relief concerning the Georgia district court’s alleged delay in ruling on her motions; her motion to proceed in forma pauperis was also denied as moot.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Writing for the Court
By the Court; Branch; Luck; Lagoa
Jurisdiction
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decision date
March 11, 2026
Docket number
No. 26-10221
Procedural posture
Pro se petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia to rule on pending emergency motions. While the petition was pending, the district court transferred the underlying case to the Southern District of Florida.
Standard of review
Mandamus is available only in drastic situations involving no other adequate means of relief and a clear usurpation of power or abuse of discretion. The court also determined mootness based on whether meaningful relief remained available.
Precedential value
Unknown
Parties
Kathryn Stillwell Dressler
Disposition
dismissed

Topics

mootnesswrit of certiorariappellate procedurecivil procedure

Practice areas

appellate procedurecivil proceduremandamusmootness

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit could grant mandamus directing the Southern District of Georgia to rule on Dressler's pending motions after the underlying case had been transferred to another district.
  2. Whether Dressler's mandamus petition and motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be dismissed or denied as moot.

Holdings

  1. The mandamus petition was moot because, after the transfer of the underlying case to the Southern District of Florida, the Eleventh Circuit could no longer provide meaningful relief concerning the Southern District of Georgia's alleged delay in ruling on Dressler's motions.
  2. Mandamus may be used to direct a district court to decide a pending case when there has been unreasonable delay, but it is available only in drastic situations where no other adequate means of relief exist and there has been a clear usurpation of power or abuse of discretion.

Key quotations

Mandamus is available “only in drastic situations, when no other adequate means are available to remedy a clear usurpation of power or abuse of discretion.” (Order of the Court 26-10221)
“[AJn issue is moot when it no longer presents a live controversy with respect to which the court can give meaningful relief.” (Order of the Court 26-10221)
Accordingly, Dressler’s mandamus petition is hereby DISMISSED as moot, and her IFP motion is DENIED as moot. (Order of the Court 26-10221)

Factual background

Dressler, proceeding pro se, initiated a civil action in the Southern District of Georgia. She began filing a series of emergency motions in December 2025 and alleged that the district court had failed to rule on them. After she filed her mandamus petition, the Georgia district court transferred the underlying action to the Southern District of Florida.

Procedural history

Dressler filed a civil action in the Southern District of Georgia and then filed motions she characterized as emergencies. She petitioned the Eleventh Circuit for mandamus based on the district court's alleged failure to rule on those motions. After the mandamus petition was filed, the Southern District of Georgia transferred the underlying case to the Southern District of Florida, eliminating the requested relief against the Georgia court.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…