Monsanto Co. v. Scruggs

345 F. App'x 552 (Fed. Cir. 2009) · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · May 4, 2009

Summary

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Scruggs’s petition for permission to take an interlocutory appeal from a certified district court order. The underlying dispute concerned infringement of Monsanto’s patents on genetically modified seeds, patent exhaustion, and the effect of Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. The court concluded that Scruggs could raise the issues in an appeal from the final judgment or injunction.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Writing for the Court
Mayer, Circuit Judge
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
May 4, 2009
Procedural posture
Petition for permission to take an interlocutory appeal from an order certified by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(2).
Standard of review
The Federal Circuit exercises discretion in deciding whether to permit an interlocutory appeal from an order certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(2).
Precedential value
Nonprecedential/unpublished Federal Circuit order
Parties
Mitchell Scruggs et al. v. Monsanto Company
Disposition
writ_denied

Topics

interlocutory appealappellate jurisdictionpatent lawpatent infringementappellate procedure

Practice areas

patent lawintellectual propertyappellate procedurecivil procedureremedies

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Federal Circuit should grant permission for an interlocutory appeal from the district court's certified order concerning the effect of Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc. on patent exhaustion.
  2. Whether the certified interlocutory issues should instead be raised on appeal from the final judgment or injunction.

Holdings

  1. The Federal Circuit denied permission to appeal because granting an interlocutory appeal was not warranted under the circumstances.

Key quotations

Ultimately, this court must exercise its own discretion in deciding whether it will grant permission to appeal interlocutory orders certified by a trial court. (553)
Scruggs may raise these issues on appeal from the final judgment or injunction. (553)
The petition for permission to appeal is denied. (553)

Factual background

Monsanto owned patents covering genetically modified crop seeds whose traits replicated in successor generations. Monsanto licensed the seeds subject to restrictions against resale without a license and against saving and replanting seed for subsequent crops. Scruggs purchased and planted the seeds without signing a Monsanto license agreement, retained successor-generation seeds, and used them in later crops, leading Monsanto to sue for patent infringement.

Procedural history

The district court granted Monsanto a preliminary injunction, later granted summary judgment finding patent infringement and rejecting patent exhaustion, and entered a permanent injunction and final judgment while staying damages proceedings. The Federal Circuit affirmed the infringement and patent-exhaustion determinations but vacated the permanent-injunction determination for reconsideration under eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. After the Supreme Court denied certiorari, the district court denied Scruggs's motion for reconsideration based on Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., certified its order for interlocutory appeal, and Scruggs petitioned the Federal Circuit for permission to appeal. The Federal Circuit denied permission.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…