United States v. Saul Enrique Cuellar-Flores

29 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 803 (5th Cir. 1989) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · December 12, 1989 · No. 89-1496

Summary

The Fifth Circuit affirmed Saul Enrique Cuellar-Flores's sentence for aiding and abetting the unlawful transportation of illegal aliens. The court held that the district court properly considered reliable hearsay evidence at sentencing, that corroboration was not required, and that the defendant bore the burden of proving the absence of a profit motive for purposes of a sentencing reduction.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Writing for the Court
GEE, Circuit Judge; GEE; DAVIS; JONES
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
December 12, 1989
Docket number
89-1496
Procedural posture
Cuellar-Flores pleaded guilty to one count of aiding and abetting the unlawful transportation of illegal aliens after the remaining counts were dismissed pursuant to a plea agreement. The district court found that the offense was motivated by profit and imposed a seven-month prison sentence. He appealed the sentencing determination.
Standard of review
The district court's finding that the offense was profit motivated was reviewed for clear error; its consideration of sentencing evidence was reviewed for abuse of discretion.
Precedential value
published
Parties
Saul Enrique Cuellar-Flores v. United States of America
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

sentencing guidelineshearsayevidencecriminal procedurestandard of review

Practice areas

criminal lawsentencingevidenceimmigration

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court properly considered hearsay and uncorroborated testimony at sentencing in determining that the offense was motivated by profit.
  2. Whether the district court clearly erred in finding that the offense was profit motivated.
  3. Whether the district court improperly placed on the defendant the burden of proving the absence of a profit motive for purposes of a mitigating sentence reduction.

Holdings

  1. A sentencing court may consider hearsay and uncorroborated testimony that has sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy; the Federal Rules of Evidence governing hearsay do not apply to sentencing proceedings.
  2. The district court did not clearly err in finding that Cuellar-Flores's offense was motivated by profit.
  3. A defendant bears the burden of proving mitigating or sentence-reducing factors, including the absence of a profit motive when seeking the applicable reduction.

Key quotations

In determining the relevant facts, sentencing judges are not restricted to information that would be admissible at trial. (891 F.2d at 92)

Factual background

Cuellar-Flores was indicted for aiding and abetting the unlawful transportation of illegal aliens and pleaded guilty to one count under a plea agreement. At sentencing, the government presented testimony from probation officer Louis Marquez, who had obtained information from the investigating case agent. The district court found the offense profit motivated and imposed a seven-month sentence, declining to apply a three-level reduction under Guideline § 2L1.1(b)(1).

Procedural history

A federal grand jury indicted Cuellar-Flores on four counts under 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Following his guilty plea to one count and dismissal of the others, the Western District of Texas determined that the offense was profit motivated and sentenced him to seven months' imprisonment. The Fifth Circuit affirmed.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…