Hodge v. Williams

343 F. App'x 979 (5th Cir. 2009) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · September 14, 2009

Summary

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal with prejudice of Marcus Hodge’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 failure-to-protect claim against Officer Williams. The court held that Hodge’s allegations did not establish deliberate indifference and did not support an award of punitive damages.

Holdings

  1. Hodge failed to allege facts sufficient to support a finding that Officer Williams was deliberately indifferent to the risk posed by Ware; Williams's ineffectual handling of the situation did not amount to deliberate indifference.
  2. Hodge failed to allege facts sufficient to support recovery of punitive damages against Williams.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Hodge alleged facts sufficient to show that Officer Williams was deliberately indifferent to a substantial risk of harm from another prisoner.
  2. Whether Hodge alleged facts sufficient to support an award of punitive damages against Officer Williams.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (2)

  • Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344, 106 S. Ct. 668, 88 L. Ed. 2d 677 (1986)(followed)
  • Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 103 S. Ct. 1625, 75 L. Ed. 2d 632 (1983)(applied)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…