Davis v. City of Bunkie

348 F. App'x 52 (5th Cir. 2009) · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · October 12, 2009 · No. No. 09-30092

Summary

The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s summary judgment dismissing the Davises’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Louisiana state-law negligence and respondeat superior claims against the City of Bunkie, its mayor, and its police chief in their official capacities. The claims arose from an illegal sexual relationship between a Bunkie police officer and the Davises’ minor daughter, and alleged municipal policy or custom, negligent supervision and investigation, and vicarious liability.

Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Writing for the Court
Reavley; Jolly; Wiener
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decision date
October 12, 2009
Docket number
No. 09-30092
Procedural posture
Plaintiffs appealed the district court's grant of summary judgment dismissing their claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Louisiana negligence and respondeat superior law against the City of Bunkie, its mayor, and its police chief in their official capacities.
Standard of review
The opinion states that the court reviewed the record and applicable federal and state law; it does not expressly identify a separate standard of review.
Precedential value
unpublished and nonprecedential under 5th Cir. R. 47.5, subject to the limited exceptions in Rule 47.5.4
Parties
LaTonja Davis, Albert Davis v. City of Bunkie, Gerard Moreau, Mary Fanara
Disposition
affirmed

Topics

civil rightsmunicipal liabilitynegligencevicarious liabilityappellate procedure

Practice areas

civil rightsmunicipal liabilitynegligencevicarious liabilityappellate procedure

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the Davises' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against the City and its officials in their official capacities.
  2. Whether the district court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the Davises' Louisiana negligence, negligent supervision and investigation, and respondeat superior claims.

Holdings

  1. The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court's summary judgment dismissal of the Davises' 42 U.S.C. § 1983, negligence, and respondeat superior claims in all respects.
  2. An official-capacity suit is treated as a suit against the governmental entity, other than in name, when the entity receives notice and an opportunity to respond.

Key quotations

As long as the government entity receives notice and an opportunity to respond, an official-capacity suit is, in all respects other than name, to be treated as a suit against the entity. (348 F. App'x at 52)

Factual background

The Davises' minor daughter developed an illegal sexual relationship with a Bunkie police officer who was not a party to the appeal or the underlying motion. The Davises sued the City of Bunkie, its mayor, and its police chief solely in their official capacities. Their federal claims alleged that a City policy or custom caused the harm, while their state-law claims alleged negligent supervision and investigation and vicarious liability for the officer's conduct.

Procedural history

The Davises brought federal civil-rights and state-law claims arising from an illegal sexual relationship between their minor daughter and a Bunkie police officer. The United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana granted summary judgment to the defendants and dismissed the claims. The Fifth Circuit reviewed the record and applicable federal and state law and affirmed in all respects.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…